Search for: "United States v. Mannings"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 6,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
, Evans v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
Accession is a one-man show, a Mr. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:58 am
The Fourth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:58 am
The Fourth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:51 pm
On the one hand, corporations declare, in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
According to Sixth Circuit, the man-woman marriage laws in these states did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment—even in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:27 am
The prosecutions were more properly brought in the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:22 am
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, it is fairly easy to make a determination that it was caused by exposure to asbestos fibers, since that is virtually the only cause of the deadly disease found in the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 6:04 am
With all the recent gun violence around the world, we have once again been hearing about efforts to increase gun control restrictions in the United States, and we have been hearing from those who oppose gun control. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm
” This provision, section two of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), was not at issue in the 2014 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling allowing for the admissibility of evidence, even if said evidence was improperly seized. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
But most Americans now agree with Warren that the United States in the 1950s and 1960s desperately needed a levelheaded form of constitutional ethics in order to bring the legacy of Jim Crow to an end. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Muldrow alleges she was transferred out of a position with an intelligence unit with prestige and desirability to a different department to make way for a man who wanted the position, thereby discriminating against her based on her gender. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 3:03 am
This extension is in response to the Supreme Court ruling that federal benefits cannot be limited based on a definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman, which was reached last year in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In the United States, governments undertake to regulate marriage by providing certain rules and rights to married people under the law. [read post]
