Search for: "Washington v. Roberts"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 4,696
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Tam are Mark Walsh at Education Week, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Tony Mauro at Law.com (subscription or registration required), and Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who reports that a “majority of the Supreme Court seemed highly skeptical” “that the federal government can refuse to register all trademarks that may be disparaging, casting this as the government improperly taking sides in free speech disputes. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am
Tam comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, who remarks on the “contradictions” that abound in the case, observing that although “a victory for the Slants would be a godsend for the Washington Redskins, whose legal battle to hold on to its revoked trademark has been put on hold pending the outcome,” the “band members abhor the Washington nickname and wince when the team’s fate is linked to their own. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm
" Emma Brown and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post report that "Supreme Court wrestles with defining rights for students with disabilities, including autism. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
Suggesting that it “would be an understatement in the extreme to call the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
They understand that when the states act, it may be without Washington’s approval. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
The Open File looks at Turner v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Appell, Washington University in St. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
The cases, Visa, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
Robert S. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:35 am
Un poco de historiaEl constituyente James Wilson, por el Estado de Pensilvania (también uno de los primero jueces del Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos, nombrados por George Washington), abogó por la elección del Presidente a través del voto popular en la Convención Constituyente del 1787. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
” In The National Law Review, Robert Manoso and Thomas Ryan discuss the court’s Monday decision in Shaw v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
Supreme Court, Judges Thomas Griffith, Brett Kavanaugh and Robert Wilkins of the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 7:08 pm
In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined "Supreme Court rules for Samsung in smartphone patent dispute. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Heckler v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
Today, the court will hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket previews all the cases in the December sitting. [read post]
