Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 2101 - 2120
of 7,293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2018, 6:48 am
On January 29, the Supreme Judicial Court in Mui v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:48 am
On January 29, the Supreme Judicial Court in Mui v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Its release caps a week that saw Trump’s candidate for U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Its release caps a week that saw Trump’s candidate for U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 10:40 am
State of Michigan, 2018 WL 618479 (6th Cir. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in MGM v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
We are recording these in the middle of the week. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am
I blogged two weeks ago about the latest twist in the Barley House YouTube video case. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:41 am
| AIPPI Event Report: Unjustified threats - are you threatening me? [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
See Eaton v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Agents of the state asked my name. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
| AIPPI Event Report: Unjustified threats - are you threatening me? [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:29 am
Then on Tuesday, February 27, the Court gets another big case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:29 pm
On Friday last week I got a call from an insurer client, who told me that in response to his approximately $21,000 subrogation demand to the insurer of a person who had negligently damaged his insured's home, my client received in the mail a check for approximately $14,000, marked "full and final settlement".Should my client cash the check? [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:15 am
In the recent case (MacKenzie v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
For two weeks in January 2018, we will be posting these materials on the CIS Blog. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
” For this blog, Robert Yablon analyzes Monday’s opinion in Artis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:51 am
The leading Supreme Court decision is Burson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:32 am
Here are a couple of the findings that were most persuasive (in addition to the fact that I think they specified fixed effects nicely):The effect is more present during the early years, and tends to get "locked in" with experienceThe effect is more present with peers than with supervisory examinersThe effect is more present for examiners who do not telecommute - this, to me, was the best robustness checkExaminers who do not telecommute tended to behave similarly in obviousness… [read post]
