Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
In other words, every dollar in taxes that corporations avoid must be balanced by higher taxes on individuals, cuts to public investments and services, and increased federal debt.This study explores how in 2015 Fortune 500 companies used tax haven subsidiaries to avoid paying taxes on much of their income. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
This Article concludes that while the cooperative fits nicely within Cuba’s efforts to develop a complex and well-integrated program of economic organization, its theoretical elegance remains in tension with the realities of Cuban politics. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
It was what Steve’s old professor had called an “efficient breach” of contract. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Taniguchi cites the Court’s landmark ruling in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am
In this episode, you’ll learn about: The prior art, or evidence, of earlier technology that EFF was able to present to courts to prove that the so-called “podcasting patent” was invalid How the landmark Alice v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am
The present Board (3.5.03) considered in particular the question of the right venue of the Boards of fundamental importance for ensuring a uniform application of the law in all appeal proceedings, and decided to refer the following questions (loosely translated from the original German wording) to the Enlarged Board:(1) In appeal proceedings, is the right to oral proceedings under Article 116 EPC restricted if the appeal is prima facie inadmissible? [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:59 am
Para tentar entender esse vocábulo é necessário descrever os vários tipos de família existentes, e suas características específicas. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 am
While this may be just a J-O-B to you, we aren't S-T-U-P-I-D. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm
The court comprised Justices Boland, Thackray and O'Ryan.The words that ring out from the judgment (aside from the huge amount of costs) were these by Thackray J:It is important to keep in mind that the wife is proposing to spend funds thatthe husband acknowledges are hers. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
As a result of the 1973 case Gagnon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
A shareholder’s ability to dispose of his stock is merely defined by the terms of the corporate contract, which in turn is provided by the firm’s organic documents and the state of incorporation’s corporate statute and common law. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
"] From Justice Brian Hofstadt's opinion Wednesday in Kaplan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Peri (2006) succinctly defined food quality as: “fitness for consumption,” in other words, “the requirements necessary to satisfy the needs and expectations of the consumer. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:39 pm
The benefit booklet wording may differ from the wording contained in the actual policy. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 10:19 pm
El laudo, que posteamos completo en este link (o puede bajarse en Word desde este otro) es largo pero de lectura ágil, ya que se pueden saltear sin mayor perjuicio las partes competenciales y probatorias. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 1:32 pm
See, http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International -Taxpayers/Options- Available-For-U-S-Taxpayers-with-Undisclosed-Foreign-Financial-Assets. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
,” “Think u can convince a judge to look at it? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
In other words, if we voted on Citizens United, I think we would have voted the other way. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:40 am
Gelbach, “Expert Mining and Required Disclosure,” 81 U. [read post]
