Search for: "Barns v. Barns"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,824
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2010, 8:03 am
The court began by applying the "presumption against preemption" recently resurrected in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
There is no evident clash between these statutes and the Barnes & Noble Rights Plan. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:06 pm
Barneli & Cie SA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Its rationale was a bit odd, and based on the fact that Leonard Riggio had not gone out of his way to buy control of Barnes & Noble, even after a 2008 rights plan had expired, slighting the reality that Riggio increased his holdings when Pershing previously bought in and that he had managed to be Barnes & Noble’s key strategic leader without having to do so, as well as having had his brother serve as CEO for many years. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:41 pm
See Barnes v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
For these reasons, it is plain that Yucaipa can win and is indeed perhaps a favorite in a proxy fight for three members of Barnes & Noble’s board. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
As “noble” is not owned by Barnes & Noble, Barnesandnoble.com, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:14 pm
Steven Davidoff (Connecticut) has some incisive analysis of eBay v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
See Portnoy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
Today and tomorrow, the Conglomerate will be hosting an online forum on recent poison pill cases, from Selectica, through this summers' Barnes & Noble litigation, through last week's Delaware decision in eBay v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
One of the directors, Michael Del Guidice, was listed by Barnes & Noble as independent. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
That is, for example, exactly what occurred in Portnoy v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
" One of the core problems with the threat issue was the fact that Barnes & Noble had a staggered board. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Second, Barnes and Noble had a staggered board. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:00 pm
” Unitrin, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
Jackson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm
Similarly, Delaware courts have recently manifested a renewed willingness to whittle away at governance-related fiduciary duties (sometimes known as Blasius duties) that are a favorite and oft-utilized weapon of hedge funds and pension funds alike (see, e.g., the recent Barnes and Noble decision from Vice Chancellor Strine – Yucaipa v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
The suit began in October of 2000, and ECUSA was named as a defendant.The next triennial budget was adopted at General Convention 2003, which saw the confirmation of the election of V. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:44 am
Barnes, his chief domestic policy adviser, said Sunday. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:37 am
Briefly: Last term in Salazar v. [read post]