Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 39,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
“The presumption that United States law governs domes-tically but does not rule the world applieswith particular force in patent law. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:29 pm
United States should have been a very easy case. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:08 am
” Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
The United States Supreme Court recently held in Heien v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
On January 12, in Sykes v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 1:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
In Grace United Methodist Church Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:49 am
It does, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:34 am
The question before us: Does Microsoft's liability extend to computers made in another country when loaded with Windows software copied abroad from a master disk or electronic transmission dispatched by Microsoft from the United States? [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:34 am
United States, No. 07-513, decision below 492 F.3d 1212 (11th Cir. 2007), posted here July 18. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
That was a question recently considered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
That was a question recently considered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:41 am
All federal judges take an oath to administer justice under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
In June, the Supreme Court agreed to review this question: Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court called a special session and heard oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
