Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 40,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:24 am
Jackie, who had Down’s Syndrome, lived in a care home for adults requiring round-the-clock supervision. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
State and federal felon-in-possession laws seem to fail the Bruen test more clearly than the statute struck down in Bruen, for no historic analogs appear close enough to make the finals—that is, to be acknowledged as “distinctly similar” and then dismissed as “outliers. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:19 pm
[3] Vokoun v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:10 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:51 am
At least 20 states are introducing similar privacy bills in their legislature right now.[9] Given the emphasis on privacy at the regulator level, it is wise for businesses to revisit or double down on their compliance efforts. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Act thus cannot be justified by Bishop v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But one of the great services done by Christian Fritz’s new book on the state-federal relationship is to remind the reader that, as much as Hamilton’s words might send chills down the spine of a twenty-first-century historian, his dire warning seemed overblown to those who lived and breathed the political culture of federalism in the early republic. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:29 am
(Ford v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
Maybe he can finally hunt the white whale from the Reagan years, and strike down the qui tam provision? [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:00 pm
At least 20 states are introducing similar privacy bills in their legislature right now.[9] Given the emphasis on privacy at the regulator level, it is wise for businesses to revisit or double down on their compliance efforts. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:57 am
United States (2012), which established a multifactor balancing test for most flooding takings cases, in this article, published soon after the decision came down. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am
On June 8, 2023, the court, in a 7-2 decision, ruled in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:55 am
On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Glacier Northwest, Inc., dba Calportland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Saint Lucia On 13 June 2023, the Privy Council handed down judgment in Hilaire v Chastanet [2023] UKPC 22. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
In chapter 16, Marc H Greenberg addresses the case of the Estate of Elvis Presley v Russen and the right of publicity. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
