Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
James Curry (Circuit);Corey Cawthon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation.Ramos v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:20 pm
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this declaration in her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In a recent case called Regnier v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
Romer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm
Would the severability clause – which, a friend reminded me, is not always sacroscant (United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses amicus briefs filed on both sides in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:45 am
., v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:28 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
9 May 2025, 11:14 am
Souter also clearly delineated the boundaries between church and state in Hurley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
The appellate court in Johnson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that states could outlaw sodomy between consenting adults. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
"In Collins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
C.M. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm
Those issues arise in the case of Perry v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:08 am
Even a few gay-marriage opponents among the law professors nevertheless believe that the federal government should honor gay marriages validly recognized by individual states. (3) Opposition to the constitutionality of DOMA Section 3 is very strong (69%). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
[Jackson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has recently concluded that discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals is discrimination on the basis of sex, which Title VII prohibits. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:35 am
Additional Resources: U.S. high court turns away dispute over gay worker protections, Dec. 11, 2017, By Andrew Chung, Reuters Evans v. [read post]
