Search for: "In re Miller " Results 2121 - 2140 of 4,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2014, 5:57 am by Matt Bouchard
  I’ve previously blogged about the actual receipt standard for Miller Act payment bond claim notices. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:11 am
Miller (In re Miller) is one of those cases where the Trustee in bankruptcy, in a zealous effort to grab the debtor's assets, ignores the Internal Revenue Code ("Tax Code"), common practice and common sense. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm by CJLF Staff
 FL High Court to Hear Case Involving Juvenile Life Sentences: A Florida woman convicted of murder when she was 15-years-old and sentenced to life in prison is asking the Florida Supreme Court to be re-sentenced under the US Supreme Court's 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court season is in full swing and we’re seeing a lot of posts on oral arguments and rulling come across the wire on the LexBlog Network. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:34 am by SHG
Wright and David Miller, 1:11-cv-01727, was filed in U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am by Ryan Scoville
Neither result is a good one, but they’re roughly equivalent insofar as the United States is allies with both countries. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
“What they’re doing is really shady,” she says.Some employees were told they are entitled to a six or eight-week pay continuation, but feel they deserve more, another source said. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:05 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you’ve been affected – or if you’re getting ready to file – keep a few things in mind: Check Social Security numbers carefully. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by Keith L. Miller
Miller, to arrange a free consultation 24 hours a day, 7 days a week by telephone at (617) 523-5803, or click here to send him a confidential email. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  We’re increasingly mandating this raw/cooked distinction, formalistic. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
The Court of Appeals’ contrary analysis rests on its misreading of In re Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725. [read post]