Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2121 - 2140 of 4,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court's landmark decision in School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by familoo
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm by Charon QC
” The most high profile media case of the week was Lord McAlpine’s claim against Sally Bercow. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm by Charon QC
” The most high profile media case of the week was Lord McAlpine’s claim against Sally Bercow. [read post]
27 May 2013, 4:18 am by Barry Sookman
In this case, Mrs Sig neither had the trade secrets nor knew that they were being misused, and therefore she did not share one of the features of the design which rendered it wrongful, namely the necessary state of knowledge or state of mind. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling,  continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for  satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice  system with it. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling,  continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for  satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice  system with it. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Lord Justice Nicholls delivered the lead judgment. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The only European authority on "staple commercial products" cited was a Patents County Court decision in Pavel v Sony Corporation where HHJ Ford stated that a "staple commercial product is a commodity or raw material". [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The House of Lords put this nicely in Hilton v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
Constitutional Affairs, Equalities, Home Affairs, Justice and Law – Lord McNally/Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords.. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
”  Eighteen months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am by INFORRM
” The case reached the House of Lords in 2007, and at that time there were two main authorities from the European Court that the law lords considered: First, there was the 2001 VgT v. [read post]