Search for: "Loving v. United States"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 6:12 pm
Virginia State Bar, 421 US 773 (1975), that the United States Supreme Court found that a bar requirement that attorneys charge clients a minimum flat fee for certain work was unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:41 am
While it is true that there was a ban on asbestos put in place in the 1970s, that ban was later overturned by the United States Supreme Court on grounds that it was enacted without constitutional authority to do so, and there were goods being made with asbestos in the early 1980s. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
To understand the Court’s ruling, let’s take a look at the case of Carolyn Jobe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:41 am
While it is true that there was a ban on asbestos put in place in the 1970s, that ban was later overturned by the United States Supreme Court on grounds that it was enacted without constitutional authority to do so, and there were goods being made with asbestos in the early 1980s. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:00 am
” Machin v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:23 am
As a result, if the Supreme Court adopts the activity/inactivity distinction, it seems likely that future Congresses will use whatever hook the Supreme Court says is required — and not one iota more — to make sure their laws pass judicial muster.We saw this with Congress’s reaction to United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
Yes, according to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 9:17 am
Prosecutors said defendant certified numerous asbestos workers between 2013 and 2016 who had never completed the training as mandated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 9:02 am
In that case, plaintiff worked on boilers as a technician for the United States Navy for all of the 1960s and most of the 1970s. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
This particular claimant worked for the state police as a videographer. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:54 am
To recollect that love story, read our post here. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:30 am
I’d love to hear from you. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:23 am
My grandson loves Grand Theft Auto, or at least he used to. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:44 am
In 2015, the group released a report stating that one in five hospitals in the United States do not meet the group’s standards for accurately reporting when never events take place. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:08 am
He was 89.Judge Pollak, who served on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was widely regarded as one of the leading members of the judiciary in the country. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
United States, 547 U. [read post]
