Search for: "Mark Case" Results 2121 - 2140 of 70,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 2:25 am by John L. Welch
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal under Sections 1, 2, 3 and 45 of the Lanham Act.TTABlog comment: Maybe this case should have been a WYHA? [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:10 am
“Use” of a mark means the bona fide use of such mark made in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark.So a party wishing to prove abandonment must start by producing evidence of three consecutive years of nonuse of the mark, creating a prima facie case of abandonment. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 2:35 pm
So why is this such an issue in Ms Swift’s case and –- to a lesser extent -– in the case of Rihanna’s passing off court case? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
 In this case, the Board sustained Honda's opposition to Herr Winkelmann's “intent to use” application to register the mark “V.I.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
While PETA may view its use as fair use due to parody, there are a number of court cases holding that parody is not a defense to an infringement of intellectual property rights in Canada. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
I will, however, dwell briefly on Mark Steyn's disastrous response. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In the outcome, the CAFC vacated a decision of the Trademark Board:This case arises from Kerry Earnhardt, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:10 am by Blog  Editorial
” The thirty panels and accompanying materials include: The story of how the Olympic movement tentatively moved from strict rules on amateurism to today’s professional arena; Brief profiles of past and present ‘Team GB’ members who have also practised in law, including ski jumper Eddie ‘the Eagle’ Edwards, Sir Menzies Campbell and rower Tom Solesbury; How UK court and tribunal cases involving footballers, horse trainers and boxers helped clarify the… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:11 pm
In this episode of SCOTUScast, Mark Behrens, a partner at the DC based law firm, Shook Hardy & Bacon, discusses the case. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:33 pm
We’ve told you a bit already about the Securities and Exchange Commission’s case against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban (pictured, right). [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:00 am
We’ve told you a bit already about the Securities and Exchange Commission’s case against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban (pictured, right). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
" "However, because a certification mark may not be used by the owner of the mark, but is instead used by authorized users, the comparison is based on the authorized users’ goods, which in this case consist of 'fresh and processed kosher foods for human consumption.'"All of Applicant’s International Class 30 food items are included within, and so are identical in part to, the goods identified in the registration as “processed… [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
Applicant Jerzy Makarczyk, appearing pro se, agreed to proceed under the Board's Accelerated Case Resolution ("ACR") regime, following the "summary judgment model. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:47 am by Marc DeGirolami
Mark Movsesian and I have this Legal Spirits podcast discussing Carson v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 10:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
Mark Jackson (University of Nevada, Reno), Sonja Pippin (University of Nevada, Reno), and Jeffrey Wong (University of Nevada, Reno) recently published an article entitled, Court Rulings in Estate Tax Cases: Is Gender a Factor? [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:38 am by John L. Welch
In any case, the disclaimer of a word does not remove the word from the mark; the consumer will still view the mark on the specimen as the unitary phrase GOURMET MEDLEY.In short, the drawing of the mark is an impermissible mutilation of the mark as used on the goods. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:26 pm
Miguel A. could have chosen any San Diego lawye for his motorcycle accident case. [read post]