Search for: "No. 337"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 4,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2010, 10:07 am
In re Certain Semiconductor Chips With Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Contain- ing Same, No. 337-TA-605, slip op. at 79 (Int’l Trade Comm’n May 20, 2009) (Public Version) (“Final Determi- nation”). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:57 pm
No. 337-TA-698 (75 Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Import: Section 337:Trademark:Registered mark, Common-law mark:Secondary meaning:Word mark: Product-packaging trade dress: Product-design trade dress:Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition:Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-936.Section 337 provides a remedy at the ITC for, among other things, “the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:40 am
Buckman bars such an action under §337(a). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:11 pm
Section 337 investigations conducted by the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:11 pm
Section 337 investigations conducted by the U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 2:27 am
More info about the Section 337 investigation you can find here.The respondents of the investigation are four Chinese Producers:Tung Fong International Promotion Co, Ltd. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 pm
No. 337-TA-849). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:44 pm
violated § 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:55 am
., No. 19-337 (sovereign immunity) Garmin USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:06 pm
At least 337 people, the vast majority of them children younger than 5, are now confirmed sick in the Canadian outbreak of E. coli infections linked to a central kitchen serving daycare centers in Calgary. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:58 am
Earlier today, the Court of Justice held that, under certain circumstances, special jurisdiction for an actio pauliana can be based on Art. 7(1) Brussels Ia (Case C-337/17 Feniks). [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am
(WHDA) Openwave – Openwave files new 337 complaint against Apple and RIM regarding certain devices for mobile data communication (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Ars Technica) Oracle – Oracle v SAP – Oracle has until end of September to accept Hamilton J ruling to reduce damages (Tangible IP) Rambus – Hynix’ request to file amicus brief denied in Rambus appeal of re-exam (IPBiz) Richtek – ITC institutes formal enforcement proceeding in Certain DC-DC… [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm
(IPKat) United States US Patents – Decisions District Court S D California: Internet search using “less-than-mainstream search engine” did not show that prior art publication was “readily available public information” and therefore not “newly discovered evidence” under FRCP 60: Presidio Components v American Technical Ceramics (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – ALJ Bullock rules on motions for summary determination… [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:59 am
In total, the four have litigated about 130 Section 337 cases in private practice - close to 20 % of all cases filed since 1974, when Section 337 took its current form. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
See 19 U.S.C. 1337 ("Section 337"). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
( § 337(a).) [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:29 am
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, February 1, 2021, at 3:00 p.m.: Stanford’s Freeman Spogli Institute will host a series of webinars on the election reform agenda of H.R. 1, the For the People Act, moderated by moderated by Nathaniel Persily, law professor at Stanford Law School, and Didi Kuo, associate director for research at Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:19 am
On June 29, 2010, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII forbids an employer from “inflicting reprisals on a third party, such as a spouse, family member, or fiancé, closely associated with the employee” who engages in protected conduct, and “if so, may that prohibition be enforced in a civil action brought by the third party victim? [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
Thanks Connie! [read post]
