Search for: "Root v. State" Results 2121 - 2140 of 4,649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
Reviewing Police Use of Force Through Root Cause Analysis Wednesday, February 15, 2017  | John F. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Neither deal with the root causes of their respective maladies… The 2011 World Conference on Social Determinants of Health brought together delegates from 125 member states and resulted in the “Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Scalia expressed his view forcefully in a dissent in the 2001 case of United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 6:45 am by John H Curley
The arbitrator's award must be affirmed, and summary judgment is therefore granted to Merck.The Court's decision in  United Steelworkers, Local 10-00086 v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Price
The Supreme Court upheld Bush’s action based on his broad statutory powers to exclude aliens from U.S. soil (see Sale v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Packingham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
An example is found in the story provided by the opinion in Tilden v. [read post]
” This immunity, the Court explained, is not rooted in sovereign immunity principles, but in the fact that drainage districts are entities with “special and limited powers and duties. [read post]
” This immunity, the Court explained, is not rooted in sovereign immunity principles, but in the fact that drainage districts are entities with “special and limited powers and duties. [read post]