Search for: "STATE v. HILL"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 5,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
(NYC Civil, Kings Co., decided 9/15/08); Lenox Hill Radiology, PC, a/a/o Busanet v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:12 am
Hill U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Hill, 199 N.J. 545, 974 A.2d 403 (2009). [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Hill’s Pet Nutrition; and Tas v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, it must be alleged that “but for” the attorney’s conduct, the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
’” And in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:32 pm
NYU Langone Health Sys. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Pulver v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 8:00 am
Avilez v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Ganka v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:23 am
The constitutionality of the SEC’s use of ALJs was recently called into question by an Atlanta federal court in Hill v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:12 pm
The pleaded case of R v Mondelly v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] EWHC 2370 (Admin) apparently concerned a prosecution in clear breach of an established and stated policy on trading standards cases, but actually addressed the lawfulness of a caution which would prevent proceedings in a court, rather than the power of a court to terminate as an abuse of process a prosecution. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
The general rule, as stated by the Supreme Court in Newport v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:54 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
Those aren't California-based, which is where most of the venture capital action in the U.S. is (Sand Hill Road). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Brain injury lawyer explains how Krohn v. [read post]
