Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,715
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 9:04 am
Case cite: Tre Milano, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
Webb v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
The justices heard two cases in the 2023-2024 term involving guns: United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:13 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
State, 317 Md. 408 (1989). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2025, 2:59 pm
Velazquez and Gibson v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:00 pm
Ohio Sales Tax Nexus Expanded for Remote Sellers Out-of-state sellers with greater than $500,000 of Ohio sales will now be required by statute to collect sales tax if the seller uses in-state software (e.g., cookies) to facilitate Ohio sales, or enters into a content distribution agreement to boost access to the seller’s website for Ohio consumers. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Rivera v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
§2902, is fairly apportioned under the Commerce Clause, when the State taxes Ford Motor Company based on the fact that its goods were "physically delivered" into the State, and whether this gross receipts tax as a transaction tax on the seller that only one State has the right to tax, rather than as a tax on income that must be apportioned, violates the Commerce Clause by permitting the taxation of sales that occur outside the… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:39 am
In Armata v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:52 pm
” In Facebook v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Nevertheless, it was persuaded by a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Quality King Distributors, v. [read post]
