Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 2121 - 2140 of 5,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2017, 7:27 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Rashid Mayo, Dequan Shields, and Eddie Tarver, the appellants, were tried jointly in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the murder of Carter Scott (“Carter”) and the attempted murder of Rashaw Scott (“Rashaw”). [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:25 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Rashid Mayo, Dequan Shields, and Eddie Tarver, the appellants, were tried jointly in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the murder of Carter Scott (“Carter”) and the attempted murder of Rashaw Scott (“Rashaw”). [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:22 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Rashid Mayo, Dequan Shields, and Eddie Tarver, the appellants, were tried jointly in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the murder of Carter Scott (“Carter”) and the attempted murder of Rashaw Scott (“Rashaw”).1 The jury convicted each appellant of one count of first-degree murder, ... [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 6:04 am by Jason Shinn
This brief was filed by the Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 6:04 am by Jason Shinn
This brief was filed by the Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 10:47 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The court cited the Supreme court’s opinion in Rodriguez v United States which states as a general matter a traffic stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made is a violation of the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 10:47 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The court cited the Supreme court’s opinion in Rodriguez v United States which states as a general matter a traffic stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made is a violation of the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:17 pm by Kathleen Scott
In the Memorandum, the President stated that it was important that this designation process be transparent, promote market discipline and reduce systemic risk because these “determinations and designations have serious implications for affected entities, the industries in which they operate and the economy at large. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:05 pm by Mark Ashton
The Appeals Court devotes much attention to the Penn State University investigation that resulted in Bagwell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
One such lawsuit was a class action filed against Company A in Indiana state court. [read post]