Search for: "State v. Hills"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 5,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, it must be alleged that “but for” the attorney’s conduct, the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:45 am
Hill NAACP v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
’” And in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Hill’s Pet Nutrition; and Tas v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
Julia Manchester of The Hill reports that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will not attend President Donald Trump’s first State of the Union on Tuesday; she will speak at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
No. 17-01005-ess.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Hill v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm
Superior Court (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355-1356 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363], quoting the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Hill & Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
Case C-281/02, Owusu v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
Last week’s oral argument in in Trump v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, Brian Yablonski and Jonathan Wood look at Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:00 am
Int’l House of Pancakes, 513 F.2d 114, 123 (8th Cir. 1975); Hill v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:44 am
The second case, filed against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the state’s flagship public university, argues that the university’s consideration of race in its undergraduate admissions process violates both Title VI and the Constitution. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:21 am
Marcy Carapezza, No. 101, 958 (Lyon)State v. [read post]
