Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 4,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
The first case today is Comcast v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:01 am
The parameters of such a duty were summarised in R (Balajigari) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2019) EWCA Civ 673: “First, the obligation on the decision-maker is only to take such steps to inform himself as are reasonable. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
In Magner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:54 am
Because of this decision, corporations now have a nearly unlimited power to cheat the people who do business with them — so long as they only do it a few dollars at a time. 5) Corporate Immunity To The Law: Roberts voted to give generic drug makers immunity to key state laws after one of their drugs caused a condition called tardive dyskinesia in many of the people who took it. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will need to… [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
” The varying effects of differing misrepresentations on independent decision makers make causation impossible to prove on anything but an individualized basis. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:21 am
Additional Resources: Jill et al v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:57 pm
E.g., Daugherty v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
The UK Supreme Court today handed down judgment in the case of Coventry v Lawrence ([2015] UKSC 50) [pdf]. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
See Shirrell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:43 pm
This case follows from the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Janus Capital v First Derivative Traders, which held that only the “maker” of a statement is liable for its falsity. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 10:07 am
Maydell, Social Rights and International Law Tafrir Malick Ndiaye, Les droits de l'homme aujourd'hui Ernest Petric, Sovereignty of State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:54 am
Queeg-like state, mumbling about going after makers of fake contact lenses while clacking ball bearings in his hand. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
Paul E. v. [read post]
