Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 19,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:50 pm
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
Florida, which concerns the constitutionality of life without parole for juvenile criminals; United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
The case illustrates the lack of regulation of compensation at the state level. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:57 am
In the Second Circuit before 2009, trademark owners had difficulty protecting their marks where the competitor's link simply shows up as "Sponsored Link" on the landing page, and no other use of the mark has been made, because of the decision in 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:40 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:38 am
LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
The value of reliance on a trade-mark registration, as opposed to prior use, stands out sharply in the recent Federal Court of Appeal of Canada case Pizzaiolo Restaurants Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
The value of reliance on a trade-mark registration, as opposed to prior use, stands out sharply in the recent Federal Court of Appeal of Canada case Pizzaiolo Restaurants Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Cir. 1984); Quaker State Oil Reining Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:46 am
But the case also stems from another Florida case, Dees v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
"JobDiva, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:03 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18593 - State v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Yesterday, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press had this article discussing Justice Stevens's longevity on the Court; the state of the docket; and Justice Scalia's absence at the Court's annual spring concert. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
(10) Where the services of an intermediary such as an operator of a website have been used by a third party to infringe a registered trade mark, does Article 11 of [Directive 2004/48] require Member States to ensure that the trade mark proprietor can obtain an injunction against the intermediary to prevent further infringements of the said trade mark, as opposed to continuation of that specific act of infringement, and if so what is the scope of the… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Virag, SRL v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
See Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
By Mark SpringIn 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Smith v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:41 am
GSH Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:53 am
Clay Mackey v. [read post]
