Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2025, 6:10 am
" Sferra Fine Linens, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
(citing Novosteel SA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:16 am
Equinix, Inc. substituted for Packet Host, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:52 am
Lovely Skin, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 3:43 am
Emerald Cities Collaborative, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am
In this post, Mark Chapman, Lauren Cousins and Jessica Eaton, all associates at CMS, comment on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC [2022] UKSC 8. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:41 am
GSH Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:53 am
Clay Mackey v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:38 am
LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
"JobDiva, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2025, 4:38 am
In Deutsche Telekom v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:28 pm
Preemption v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Unfortunately, in Garcia he missed the mark. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 8:55 pm
Mark Satta (Wayne State University Law School; Wayne State University - College of Arts and Sciences) has posted Same-Sex Wedding Service Refusals and Obergefell's "Decent and Honorable" Dicta (Wayne State University Law School Research Paper (forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Virag, SRL v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Basically, the court has to explain why Mark Zuckerberg isn’t engaged in state action. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am
The case considered the EU policy of parallel imports, and addressed the question of whether an importer of goods bearing a registered mark into the EEA without the consent of the trade mark proprietor is entitled to defend an action for trade mark infringement on the basis that the proprietor is engaged in conduct calculated to: obstruct the free movement of goods between member states; or distort competition in the EEA market for the goods (the so called… [read post]
