Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 4,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
In Java case, Federal Circuit just declined to hold massive body of creative stuff non-copyrightable
10 May 2014, 12:23 am
About two years ago I already wrote that "Oracle v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:49 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:58 pm
FDA states it has a long history of using RWD and RWE in its regulatory decision-making for devices and conducted a sample analysis of the range of RWE that have been used in regulatory decisions in premarket submissions. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:14 pm
According to the state Department of Safety, New Hampshire is one of four states in the country that does not collect DNA samples from all felons. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:34 am
First, in CSL Plasma Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
" Br. of Amicus United States 19-20. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:22 pm
In Marchand v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:41 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: Hernandez v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States, Pam Karlan in Lozman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Whilst PACE stated that Samples “may be retained” the ACPO guidelines were strict, mandating that Samples “must be retained save in exceptional circumstances”. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:27 am
Supreme Court decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:23 am
Duxbury v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:33 am
” The EEOC has appealed that case, captioned EEOC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
If the state cannot show that all 3 of the above conditions have been met the interference will be unlawful. [read post]
