Search for: "State v. Tolle" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm by Tejinder Singh
On Tuesday, October 15, the Justices will hear argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:10 am
Last year I blogged about the Court of Appeals (highest court in NY State) case of Hastings v Suave where the Court made an exception to the general rule that, if an animal harms someone, the owner can be held liable only if he knew or should have known that the animal had "vicious propensities". [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
Contracts -- Torts -- Jurisdiction -- Non-residents -- Law firm's action against former client for breach of contract and against former client's attorney for tortious interference with contract -- Allegations that out-of-state client breached contract with Florida attorneys by failing to make payment in state were sufficient to bring former client within ambit of long-arm statute -- Former client had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida where she voluntarily contracted with… [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:31 pm by lennyesq
Attorney for the Southern District of New York described his staff under the shutdown: “only a small number of Assistants and staff have been excepted from the furlough”–and among these are the members of the trial team in the United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:31 pm by lennyesq
Attorney for the Southern District of New York described his staff under the shutdown: “only a small number of Assistants and staff have been excepted from the furlough”–and among these are the members of the trial team in the United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 6:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The landmark case of Guggenheimer v Ginzberg sets forth the guideline that whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action, thereby defeating defendants' motions, the court will consider whether the plaintiff has a cause of action rather than whether he has properly stated one. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:59 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 Although Wal-Mart agreed that the Dukes case tolled the statute of limitations on individual claims, the company noted that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Griffin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
United States; Jess Bravin of the Journal was there, too. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:25 am
July 29, 2011) (“the filing of a prior [Pennsylvania] action will not toll the limitations period for a subsequently filed state action where the first action was terminated by a discontinuance”); Stout v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While an information must state the crime with which the defendant is charged and the particular facts constituting that crime as held in People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]