Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 2121 - 2140 of 7,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2020, 11:33 am by Jonathan Bailey
In March 1994, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down one of the most important decisions in modern copyright history: Campbell v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am by Schachtman
  Not surprisingly, this book is waved around by plaintiffs’ counsel in cross-examinations in courtrooms all across the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the Court held that the statute did not apply extraterritorially absent strong domestic activity that touches and concerns the United States sufficient to activate the statute. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:16 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed the initial complaint for failure to plead particularized facts giving rise to a strong inference that defendants made the alleged misrepresentations with scienter. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
As the two largest consumers and producers of energy, there can be no solution to this challenge without the efforts of both China and the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am by John Mikhail
., born outside of the territories that became the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
  Breyer discussed Bush v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  The Fourteenth Amendment, as understood by Republicans in Congress, gave the national government the power to ensure that state governments both protected and equally protected the fundamental rights of all persons in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:17 am by Jarod Bona
In the United States, Section 2 of the Sherman Act makes it illegal for anyone (person or entity) to “monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:17 am by Jarod Bona
In the United States, Section 2 of the Sherman Act makes it illegal for anyone (person or entity) to “monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations. [read post]