Search for: "United States v. Lee"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2010, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:25 am
Rather than accept defeat, it appealed the TTAB decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
(Tim Lee’s shorter Cato@Liberty post about Justice Stevens’ legacy in tech is here.) [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
See Abecassis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:08 pm
The public has a presumptive right of access to these proceedings, and where, as in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:27 am
Morrison or United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:05 pm
In Sonzinsky v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
The Wall Street Journal — with many friends on both sides of the conservative debate, including Andy McCarthy on one side and David Rivkin and Lee Casey on the Wittes letter — offered a sensible disentangling of the issues.) [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
This understanding of Dirks was implicitly confirmed by the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
A district court sitting in diversity applies the choice-of-law rules of the state in which it sits. [*13] See Lee v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm
Judge O’Malley wrote an interesting dissent while sitting by designation in Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
