Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 8,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Maynard battled former solicitor general Don Verrilli in the case of The Weird Sisters v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:03 am
F.T.C. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:07 pm
Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
R (S) v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
State Department. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
In this week’s case (Miller v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:37 am
In Harris v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 3:30 am
Gerald D. or Troxel v. [read post]
Why Virginia will not be invited to the dance (the Supreme Court battle over the individual mandate)
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 pm
See, e.g., Watt v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:23 pm
Marbury v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
The big legal question these days is whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:25 am
The environmental groups in the pipeline litigation have relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1872 decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:52 am
” Jack explained how the Supreme Court’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
Section 1373 thus impermissibly forecloses New York [v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:40 am
Supreme Court today, for the first time, will consider what is the correct test in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
If the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion on integrated schools and ignored Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 4:09 pm
On 4 February 2021, the Constitutional Court handed down its decision in the case of AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2021] ZACC 3. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]