Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 40,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 3:28 am
Secondly, the court holds that the Land Rover Defender must be considered a work of applied art, to which article 2(7) BC applies. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 3:25 pm
Heck bar does not apply where the plaintiff was never able to file a habeas case because he was not sentenced to imprisonment. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:43 am
Recently a caller asked: Does the fact that the defendant was found in possession of goods five days after they were stolen create an inference that he stole them? [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Where the law requires only that the defendant have intentionally acted in some way, it does not matter that the defendant believed in good faith--whether on the basis of counsel's advice or for some other reason--that the conduct was legal. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 5:38 am
Defendants ordinarily hate e-discovery - that is, the discovery of electronically stored information. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:51 am
Nov. 2, 2010). [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:54 pm
Defendant was a suspect in possessing 2 tons of marijuana in a house. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am
Because section 706(2) does not tell courts to give a remedy of vacatur as setting aside, that provision does not call for a universal remedy. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:18 am
March 2, 2012) [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:31 am
Kincaid-Chauncey, No. 06-10544 (2-20-09). [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 pm
The first, where the crime is directed at a stranger, clearly does not apply here. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
Defendant filed a motion to exclude this expert from testifying. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
The law does not permit it. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
Does that change anything for the peaceful protesters? [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 11:01 am
Pursuant to Correction Law § 168–a(2)(d), certain defendants convicted of sex offenses in other jurisdictions must register as sex offenders in New York as in People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 2:15 pm
The case law also does not support the defendant's position. [read post]
5 May 2008, 8:10 pm
LEXIS 205 (May 2, 2008).* Plain feel did not apply to a folded dollar bill that was touched and moved past in a search. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:21 pm
What kind of criminal record (if any) does the defendant have? [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:31 am
Defendant contends that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender because his D.C. conviction does not qualify as a predicate felony for sentencing purposes under New York law. [read post]
