Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 5,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
That does not deprive the claimant of his claim for damages, but it weakens his claim for an injunction. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:31 pm
Lancet. 353:1136-39. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
A search of reported family judgments for the term polygraph brought up only one hit : F v Y (ABDUCTION: ACQUIESCENCE) [2014] 2 FLR 875 (HHJ Horowitz QC sitting as a HCJ), a case in which there is a single reference to a polygraph test taken by a Russian father, apparently in another jurisdiction, but it does not appear the test was adduced in evidence. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
1. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 12:49 pm
App. 1 Cir. 9/12/11), 77 So.3d 39. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Most importantly, under the Court's approach, as under the existing accommodation, separate “contraceptive coverage [would] be obtained by petitioners’ employees through petitioners’ insurance companies,” Order at 1, and the insurer would make payments to the employees, dependents and/or students directly, not through the employer’s health plan. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
Br. 38-39; Unlawful Presence Guidance 9-11. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
The two rulings are explained in more detail in Post 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 12:40 pm
The bad news for kennels, pounds, shelters and pet shops does not stop there. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 12:40 pm
The bad news for kennels, pounds, shelters and pet shops does not stop there. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:54 am
Exercise 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
” Id. at col. 4 ll. 37–39. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:12 am
" [para 39; this, frankly, is a bold move on the side of the AG, who is clearly suggesting that the CJEU should depart from Svensson, without explicitly saying so - at least in this part of the Opinion (keep reading) - and by making actually the Opinion look like it was in line with Svensson and its progeny]Furthermore, continues the Opinion, in BestWater the relevant work [a YouTube video] the link in question referred to was not even… [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:55 am
This expression does not admit of restrictive meaning. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
The text of the Federal Rules offers more guidance than does Section 90.701 because it specifies that lay opinion testimony is not based on “specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
Case 1: RainDance Techs. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:19 am
A supported decision-making agreement does not prevent an adult with a disability from seeking confidential information on his or her own without the assistance of the supporter. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
How much does the expert know about the ocular medical history of the suspect? [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
Nicely, 39 Ohio St.3d 147, 150 (Ohio Supreme Cour [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm
Of course the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade does not vouch for these lawyers, but the list is often a very useful starting point. [read post]
