Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 3,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
* Letter from Japan 1: product placement(Almost) directly from Japan, Laetitia Lagarde pens the first of an occasional series of Japan-related blog posts. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
Appellant’s Br. 51. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm
In a footnote, the DoD Manual does quote from the Koh speech to further amplify how the U.S. would decide if a particular cyber event constituted a use of force. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am
His books are worthy of study: 1. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
That was so even though it was common practice in the beauty products sector to market products either under a combination of surnames and first names or alternatively under one or the other.The decision in Case C-51/09 Becker v Harman International Industries (BARBARA BECKER v BECKER) could apply by analogy to this controversy in order to conclude that a likelihood of confusion does not automatically exist 'when the earlier mark consists of a first name and the mark… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
But what, one may ask, does this long prologue have to do with online dispute resolution (ODR)? [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
” Id. at *1 (quoting 21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1)(B)).In our experience, most companies, when faced with a competitor that they believe is violating the FDCA (such as by off-label promotion) will tip off the FDA and watch as the Agency comes down upon the miscreant like a ton of bricks. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:56 am
Daniels, 51 N.C. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Recently, Bexis attended the DRI drug and device committee spring conference. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:05 am
These fees are usually due in August or September, to be paid before the start of the FCC’s fiscal year on October 1. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The Judge noted ([110]) that these included the protection of human autonomy and dignity (see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 [51]). [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:09 am
To qualify as a SDVOSB, it isn’t enough that service-disabled veterans own at least 51% of the company. [read post]
16 May 2015, 2:10 pm
WalletHub.com rated all 50 states plus the District of Columbia in order from the riskiest states that will hit your wallet the hardest (#1) to the most lenient states that may save you money but not protection (#51). [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
Gadbois, jr. in making this piece possible. [1] Among the many articles on this topic, see e.g. [read post]
14 May 2015, 5:46 pm
Fairfax County Sch Bd 553 F.3d 315, 51 IDELR 148 (4th Cir 1/14/09). [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Id. at 943-51. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
1. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm
In addition, SSDI benefits are only provided to workers with permanent and total disabilities.1 In contrast, workers’ compensation benefits are provided for both permanent total and permanent partial disability. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm
However, the California Supreme Court has determined that the Unruh Act is not a bar to discrimination for all types of classifications of consumers and does not prohibit discrimination based on mere financial or economic status.[4] For instance, economic ability to meet the consumer’s obligations is a permissible distinction, but exclusion of a particular vocation unrelated to economic ability or any other legitimate business reason is not. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
His concurring opinion does not question, or even cite, Smith, Miller, or the third-party doctrine in any way. [read post]
