Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
Id. at 54. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:49 pm
I recently joined all of them and would encourage as many of you as possible to join 1 or more. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Dissidents achieved success well over half of the time.In 54 per cent of all board-related contests, dissidents were successful in their public campaign for board change.3. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Unless and until Congress does so, we must apply and enforce the statute as it's now written. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Unless and until Congress does so, we must apply and enforce the statute as it's now written. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 7:29 pm
Articles 1-10 focus on general principles and provisions. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 64 (1986). [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Given the fact that D8 and D9 have the same filing date as the patent-in-suit and therefore do not represent state of the art according to A 54(2) EPC 1973 or A 54(3), these documents cannot be used for any novelty objection. [2.3] Furthermore, the patent-in-suit does not define a sub-range of a broader numerical range, but a selection of individual (classes of) enzymes mentioned distinct from the ones used in D7. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:40 am
” See ’111 patent, col. 17, ll. 54-65. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Case Law, 6th ed., 2010, I.C.1.4). [6.4.3] The appellant proprietor contested at the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board that the unidentified prior art mentioned in the opposed patent at paragraph [0013] was state of the art under A 54(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
It remains however to be established if this also applies to the objections under A 54 and A 56. [10] The subject matter of claim 1 of the main request is a replication defective pseudotyped HIV-based retrovirus. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
., 2:1) with substantial evidence. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Does Copyright Raise Prices In a purely competitive market, the price of a good tends toward the marginal cost of producing the good. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 5:06 pm
At issue was Article Article 11355 of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure, which provides: 1. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The only documents that refer to the aspect ratio are not part of the state of the art within the meaning of A 54(2). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm
However, document A1 gives the skilled person no information about how these choices are to be done, and it is constant case law that, if more than one choice has to be made in order to arrive at the subject-matter claimed, novelty has to be acknowledged. [4.3.3] In the board’s view, document A2, state of the art under A 54(2), also does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
The findings are based on an online survey of 6,224 consumers across Brazil, China, India, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States conducted in September and October 2012.Well, what does this mean? [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm
” [ER 54.] [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm
Still, the finding does need to be evaluated with caution. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the rejection of the opposition against the patent under consideration.Claim 1 as granted read:1. [read post]
