Search for: "In Re Baby Doe"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 2,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 4:06 am
Then ACTA ... now Berlin wants to build toll booths on the internet" pjblack.me/IlzhXQ #lwb486 from @tnw: "Why We Get so Angry Online and How to Deal with the Rage" pjblack.me/Hmzqq7 from @TheAtlanticWire: "Putting the Question of the Male-Female Platonic Friendship to Rest" pjblack.me/HxMBWf court rules it does not have the power to stop a woman from having an abortion against the wishes of the baby's father pjblack.me/HxMvhs… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
Married with babies. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:34 am
Payback, baby. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
While tribe members on Indian Reservations are permitted to buy cigarettes tax-free for personal use, the volume of cigarettes sold by the defendants translates to every resident of this reservation, including babies, each smoking 19,200 cigarettes every single day. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
Hot news, baby. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc 3d 679 [Fam Ct Otsego… [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
What is mootness and when does it apply? [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:10 am
To be sure that does happen but here’s an open secret of the judicial process. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
The record does not support their argument. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:35 am
That’s no way to protect and defend the Constitution, and we’re doomed to fall off the stool. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Even if they did that, there'd then always be the risk that I take my card with the video of baby's first steps (or whatever) and pop into your camera to grab your graduation snaps and whoops! [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:23 am
Holding: Under the principles of res judicata, a court does not have the discretion to reopen a custody order simply because, looking at the best interests of the child, it believes it can make a better decision than was made in the prior custody order. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
You can't learn to make decisions if you're always told what to do. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:04 am
It does. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 4:09 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Re-label the cans with a marker. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:09 am
Here are some steaming hot employment law news items for this sweltering mid-July: EEOC does nothing to protect actor wrongfully terminated because of arrest record. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:04 pm
FACUA-Consumers in Action, a consumer group, is reporting two women have lost their babies as part of the outbreak. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:26 am
But does the outcome show bias in the judges, in the law, or sound judicial reasoning? [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:23 am
Holding: Under the principles of res judicata, a court does not have the discretion to reopen a custody order simply because, looking at the best interests of the child, it believes it can make a better decision than was made in the prior custody order. [read post]
