Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 2141 - 2160 of 7,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 5:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Fifth Circuit’s active bench of 15 judges split 9-to-6 in refusing to review the law after a three-judge panel had divided 2-to-1 in upholding the law against a challenge by an abortion clinic and two doctors. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This article: 1) discusses why, and how, corporate victims are paying ransom to ransomware attackers; 2) analyzes the legalities involved when a corporation refuses to disclose publicly the details of a ransomware attack; and 3) offers some thoughts on the future concerning ransomware’s current economic boom. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
Garrison Lecture, in which he argued for the importance of the work that he and his comrade-in-arms, Gerald Markowitz, have done as historian expert witnesses in tort cases.1 Although I am of course grateful for the shout out that Professor Rosner gives me,2 I am still obligated to call him on the short-comings of his account of silicosis litigation.3 Under the rubric of “the contentious struggle to define disease,” Rosner presents a tendentious account of… [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Among other things, following the news of the data breach, press reports began circulating that on August 1, 2017 – that is, just days after the breach was discovered — Chief Financial Officer John Gamble sold shares worth $946,374 (about 13% of his holdings) and that Rodolfo Ploder, president of workforce solutions, had sold $250,458 of stock (about 4% of his holdings) on Aug. 2. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
(c) 4.50% 36 1.90% 6.40% 31 4.50% Tenn. 7.00% 2 2.47% 9.47% 1 2.750% Tex. 6.25% 13 1.94% 8.19% 12 2.00% Utah (b) 5.95% 26 0.99% 6.94% 26 2.750% Vt. 6.00% 16 0.18% 6.18% 36 1.00% Va. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Patent laws usually have two objectives: 1) To disclose inventions for the benefit of mankind; and 2) To incentivize inventors and investors. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
See,  77 FR 30197, 30198 (explaining that randomness in the pilot was necessary to “ensure that the resulting assessment is not skewed by consideration of registrations with particular criteria, and that implementation of the rules does not create an unfair burden on specific types of trademark owners”). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
("Papa John's" or the "Company").[1] Since around 1993, Schnatter has served as a member of the Company's board of directors (the "Board").[2] Until recently, Schnatter served as the Company's Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and spokesman.[3] He is the Company's largest stockholder, owning approximately 30% of the outstanding shares.Papa John's is a Delaware corporation and currently… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  The metaphor has been used by other writers in a variety of ways:  to describe a character lacking self-restraint,[1] a “sailor without a grievance,”[2] and a “mere gallimaufry of inconsistencies. [read post]
It will, in particular, examine (1) the process by which a first instance judge may arrive at his interpretation of the meaning, and (2) the circumstances in which an appellate court may override a lower court’s decision as to the meaning. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
It will, in particular, examine (1) the process by which a first instance judge may arrive at his interpretation of the meaning, and (2) the circumstances in which an appellate court may override a lower court’s decision as to the meaning. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Beaumarchais used three main arguments to convince the French government to help the American colonists: (1) revenge for its humiliating loss to Britain during the Seven Years’ War (known in America as The French and Indian War); (2) a chance to reclaim Canada; and (3) special trading privileges with the new colonies. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:26 am
And so the Board affirmed the refusal under Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act. [read post]