Search for: "People v Person" Results 2141 - 2160 of 31,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, Binchy J held that where there is sufficient evidence of a threat to the life or bodily integrity of a person, the court grant appropriate injunctive relief to that person even though it may involve overriding a different constitutional right of another (see Foley v Independent Newspapers [2005] 1 IR 88, [2005] IEHC 14 (28 January 2005)). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
State laws defining and regulating marriage, of course, must respect the constitutional rights of persons, see, e.g., Loving v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm by Donald Thompson
”IMAGING DEVICE means any mechanical, digital or electronic viewing device, camera or any other instrument capable of recording, storing or transmitting visual images that can be utilized to observe a person (Penal Law § 250.40[2]).SURREPTITIOUSLY means that the act was done stealthily or secretively (People v Piznarski,113 AD3d 166 [3rd Dept 2013], citing Dictionary.com [Dictionary.com Unabridged, Random House, Inc.]). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
” Judge Agee notes that en banc court “haphazardly merges alleged injuries unique to two different claims, and personal to different people, to manufacture standing. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am by Emma Cross
Link to part 1- http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-jetivia-sa-anor-v-bilta-uk-ltd-ors-2015-uksc-23-part-1/ [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]