Search for: "State v. Dakota" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
  As of July 18, 2023, a total of 10 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from four states (CA (2), HI (1), OR (1), WA (6)). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
Image from Fog’s marketing brochure, sent to North Dakota and Chino, CA, which appears to show a single location signal as viewed with Fog’s service. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That would leave the rather bizarre effect that the mandate was in effect in much of the nation, but not in the seven states that are located in the Eighth Circuit: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and North and South Dakota. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 2020, South Dakota enacted SB 180, a law that required paid ballot petition circulators to disclose their name, home address, email address, phone number, government-issued ID, voter registration state, petition sponsor name and sex offender status before they may circulate any petitions. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1: Sales Tax Treatment of Food is Haphazard in State Tax Codes Unequal Treatment of Groceries, Candy, and Soda in State Tax Codes as of January 1, 2018 State State General Sales Tax Grocery Treatment Candy Treated the Same as Groceries? [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
In a Nov. 1 letter, the senators called on the SEC not to take action on either draft rule and instead allow shareholders to continue filing proxy access resolutions based on the 2006 AFSCME v. [read post]
The driver thereafter filed a motion in arrest of judgment based on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]