Search for: "State v. Register" Results 2141 - 2160 of 13,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
In re Cordua Rests., 118 USPQ2d at 1638 cited in Royal Crown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:54 am by Bianca Saad
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA) and two of its employees filed an action against the CalSavers Retirement Savings Program (CalSavers) (HJTA v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:15 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
  [1]Ogunsola v All Nigeria Peoples Party (2003) 9 NWLR (Pt. 826) 462, 480. [2] (2021) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1778) 237. [3]Oshiomhole v Salihu (No. 1) (2021) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1778) 237, 275-6. [4](2003 ) 9 NWLR (Pt. 826) 462, 480 . [5] Ogunsola v All Nigeria Peoples Party (2003 ) 9 NWLR (Pt. 826) 462, 480 . [6] Capital Bancorp Ltd v Shelter Savings and Loans Ltd (2007) 3 NWLR 148; Dairo v Union Bank of Nigeria Plc (2007) 16 NWLR (Pt 1059) 99,… [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:35 am by Amy Howe
The court granted Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 3:22 am by Marcia Coyle
In Dobbs, the state of Mississippi says the landmark abortion ruling, Roe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]