Search for: "Thompson v. State" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2010, 9:55 am by Mark Bennett
There is no justification for something the Court of Criminal Appeals has said “no reasonably competent prosecutor” would do, Thompson v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 1:59 am by Frank Cranmer
A recent Australian decision in the case of Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156[2] highlights the problem. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:34 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
One of the more infamous examples of the legal risks faced by companies who use staffing agency employees is Vizcaino v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
The States and the Louisiana Approach Based in large measure on the nation’s revolutionary past, states have historically and for some time recognized the value in public access to courtrooms. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States has won the first round of litigation against Qualcomm. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am by Terry Hart
”1 Only two years later, Supreme Court Justice Thompson said in his dissent to the seminal opinion in Wheaton v. [read post]