Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 2,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
United States, 517 F.3d 1319, 1330-31 (Fed. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
United States, 884 F.2d 563 (Fed. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:25 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:52 am
United States, 517 F.3d 1319, 1330-31 (Fed. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
In particular, there was no counterpart in PECUSA's Constitution to the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:23 am
All of the attorneys in the audience will recall at least one case they read in law school where the judge reached a result that was at odds with the case law on the subject, and the unsurprising lesson that judges sometimes make decisions they feel are right, as in the interests of justice, and then stretch and pull and piece together the rules to justify their opinions. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Physician Hospitals of America, along with the Texas Spine and Joint Hospital, a 20-bed private facility in Tyler, Texas, are challenging the constitutionality of Section 6001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act.Civil rights -- Municipal corporations -- Employment discrimination -- Retaliation -- Title VII -- Error to dismiss Title VII retaliation claim based on determination that factual findings of county personnel board, an independent… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Unfortunately, one thing that often transcends State lines, as we all know from the State tobacco litigation, are certain companies with a corporate culture that punishes whistleblowers for being ‘‘disloyal’’ and ‘‘litigation risks. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
As you can guess from the title, Berger's book was very critical of the Warren court (and its aftermath in the 70s). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is brand new. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm
Wrotnowski was a challenge to Barack Obama’s qualifications to serve as President of the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:25 pm
At issue in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
After all, no right-thinking American would question whether terrorists, identified as any person a law enforcement officer arrests for "terrorist offenses found in chapter 113B of Title 18, or comparable offenses under state law," deserve rights. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:54 am
Charlotte Law’s print collection for this title goes back to the volume 19, published in 1985, to the present and full text for all issues but those contained in the latest volume are also available electronically through HeinOnline. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:41 am
(v) Whether the Company Law Board confined its role to look at the alleged interests of the company alone when apparently larger public interest is involved by allowing the application through the impugned order? [read post]
