Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 2141 - 2160 of 16,262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2021, 10:26 am by Eve Brensike Primus
The 6th Circuit voted 8-7 to deny en banc review, with two of the eight judges (Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton and Judge Raymond Kethledge) writing that they believed the panel decision was wrong but not en banc worthy. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  In 2010 he was appointed as a Specialist Circuit Judge sitting in what was then the Patents County Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  In 2010 he was appointed as a Specialist Circuit Judge sitting in what was then the Patents County Court. [read post]
A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the trial court in the District of Northern California erred in certifying the class and remanded the case to reconsider certification of the class and to examine the case under FTC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 6:19 am by wbroman
§ 287(a): Patentees, and persons making, offering for sale, or selling within the United States any patented article for or under them, or importing any patented article into the United States, may give notice to the public that the same is patented, either by fixing thereon the word “patent” or the abbreviation “pat. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
In response to these requests for presidential records, Trump declared that “[e]xecutive privilege will be defended, not just on behalf of my Administration and the Patriots who worked beside me, but on behalf of the Office of the President of the United States and the future of our Nation. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, 447 U.S. 649 (1980); United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 11:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Instead, "only decisions of the United States Supreme Court, [the Eleventh Circuit], or the highest court in a state can 'clearly establish' the law. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
Although the Ninth Circuit reversed Judge Koh’s 2019 judgment and vacated her 2018 summary judgment determination as moot, the Ninth Circuit explicitly did not reach the merits of Judge Koh’s determination that Qualcomm’s FRAND commitments obligate it to license to rival chip suppliers.3This two-part series addresses this ongoing dispute about who must be licensed to FRAND-committed SEPs, and shows that the arguments advanced by some SEP holders… [read post]