Search for: "United States v. Man" Results 2141 - 2160 of 6,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Schachtman
Affinia Group, 2016‐Ohio‐2830, ¶ 37, 54 N.E.3d 174, 182; In reJames Wilson Assoc., 965 F.2d 160, 173 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
United States, which made Nixon accept his guilt in the Watergate controversy by also accepting the pardon. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
A medical device is “an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is: recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them, intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or… [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm by James Yang
Basis for patent eligibility standards In July 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published its PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: REPORT ON VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm by James Yang
Basis for patent eligibility standards In July 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published its PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: REPORT ON VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] Now, it is located at the Supreme Court, 1 First Street, Northeast, Washington, D.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
"Cell phone users have an expectation of privacy in their cell phone location in real time and that society is prepared to recognize that expectation as reasonable," Judge Hamilton wrote, citing an important Supreme Court decision from 1967 known as United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 4:40 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
And third, they explore a brand-new opinion from the district court in United States v. [read post]