Search for: "YOUNG v. STATE"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 8,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am
United States (here, with Gabriel Lather) and Hickenlooper v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:46 pm
The stated rationale behind them is to avoid offering so much money that donors, especially those who are often young and poor, will rush to contribute their eggs without considering the risks. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
A few years ago, he argued in Morse v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Wednesday’s oral argument in Young v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
On the facts, Kaldor's case failed since the prima facie case in favour of copying was weak and there was evidence of independent design.Next case under review was DKH Retail v H Young came next [it's noted here on the Class 99 design law blog], this being a design infringement case involving a gilet. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
Arguing for the state of Michigan in Schuette v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Glispie v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:57 am
Young et al., v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:30 am
The ruling in Graham v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
Litzinger then called the First Assistant United States Attorney for North Dakota, who said that the VHS tapes were within the scope of the warrant. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
The case is Coffman v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
But we are bound by our Court’s decision in Sutherland v. [read post]
