Search for: "York v. Texas" Results 2141 - 2160 of 3,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin – is a “young woman whose dreams were dashed because of discrimination sanctioned by the state . . . [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
”   Briefly: Commentary on the Court’s decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Hardwick and Texas v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Baxter Healthcare Corp (Gray on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Qui tam plaintiff cites Professor Crouch’s question to readers as proof that patent expiration dates are not readily ascertainable: North Texas Patent Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Adam Liptak of the New York Times writes that the decision in Trump v. [read post]
Legislation to tax digital advertising revenue has also been introduced in other states, including Texas (H.B. 4467), West Virginia (S.B. 605), Massachusetts (H.D. 3210 and H.D. 3601) and New York (S. 1124). [read post]
Legislation to tax digital advertising revenue has also been introduced in other states, including Texas (H.B. 4467), West Virginia (S.B. 605), Massachusetts (H.D. 3210 and H.D. 3601) and New York (S. 1124). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Texas 14-292Issue: (1) Whether the former Texas special issues for death penalty sentencing do provide – as the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held – or do not provide – as the Fifth Circuit has held – an appropriate vehicle for the jury to consider and give full effect to mitigating evidence of good character, such that failure to provide a separate question violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court’s jurisprudence in… [read post]