Search for: "Abid v. Abid" Results 2161 - 2180 of 3,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 9:07 am by Jennifer Lynch
The CPRA was intended to ensure government accountability; with a ruling like this, the public’s ability to be a check against arbitrary and discriminatory police practices is severely weakened. - Court Order — EFF & ACLU v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:13 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Image: Devon D'EwartPart V: Copyright Exceptions and TechnologyThis final part, consists of only one chapter, which is a shame as such an interesting topic could have benefited from further perspectives. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:36 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  Finally, I’ve also heard some cite a case from Michigan called Grievance Administrator v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is one of those cases that seems to be an extreme outlier, but then again see United We Stand America v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:49 am by Yishai Schwartz
Moreover, Footnote 3 of the JCPOA’s Annex V explicitly warns that “[t]he provisions of this [Security Council] Resolution do not constitute provisions of this JCPOA. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm by Daniel F. Bernard
Penalties: Employers are subject to civil penalties of at least $50 per day for failure to adopt a plan, and not less than $1,000 or more than $10,000 for failure to abide by an activated plan. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
The Constitution shouldn’t abide such a remarkably expansive understanding of military jurisdiction—and the justices should grant certiorari in Larrabee, and say so. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Back in 2012, it was crystal clear (to me anyway) that Justice Kagan should recuse herself from the important Obama Care case NFIB v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tabatha Abu El-HajIn my last post, I suggested that McKesson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:58 am
For instance, a case of this kind was recently decided in Sweden [disclaimer: my current employer represented one of the parties to the litigation].In late January 2018 the Patent and Market Court in Konsumentombudsmannen v Alexandra Media Sweden & Tourn Media (PMT 11949-16), ruled that famous Swedish blogger and influencer Kissie was responsible for misleading marketing on social media. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:56 pm by Larry
The most recent detailed discussion of this from a federal court is in United States v. [read post]