Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 7,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 8:45 am
Take, for example, Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 6:03 pm
If this was the only evidence adduced at trial -- say, at a retrial -- and the prosecution didn't introduce the mother's driver's license, birth certificate, express testimony as to her age, etc., I'd have zero doubt that it was insufficient. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:26 am
At that point, the company didn't need her to sign a whole new set of onboarding documents -- they already had her W-4, her date of birth, etc. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 12:38 pm
Conservative critics of Roe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:34 am
Borawick v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:41 am
White v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:44 pm
(Molien v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:34 pm
Here is the abstract: As several scholars have noted, the Supreme Court’s Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:20 am
Under the case of Miranda v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:59 am
”); Tsarbopoulos v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:22 pm
Vox: “Eighteen months after the Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am
Burwell, the challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate, and Spokeo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:28 pm
Alquijay v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
OMH, Lambert claimed, (1) found her to be her eligible for FMLA benefits on February 1995 but (2) terminated her in March 1995.The court never reached the merits of Lambert’s allegations, holding that [s]ince Lambert’s FMLA claim against the Office of Mental Health is predicated on a request for leave involving her own health condition (in contrast, for example, to a request for leave for the birth of a child), it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment.The court cited Hale… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:03 pm
Wingate v. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 7:00 am
Welcome: Professor Richard Lazarus, Co-Director, Supreme Court Institute, Georgetown University Law Center Introduction: Professor Susan Low Bloch, Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett, Georgetown University Law Center Topic: Birth and End of Life Decisions Cases: Gonzales v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 9:07 am
See also, Schorpp-Replogle v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:46 pm
I wonder how many birth certificates that should legitimately list the time of birth as 11:58 PM are fudged to 12:00:03 AM at the behest of competitive hospital marketing staffs. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am
" The appropriate standard of review, said the Appellate Division, is whether SCI's determination "was affected by an error of law," citing Mulgrew v Board of Education of the City School District of New York, 87 AD3d 506. [read post]
