Search for: "Branch v. United States" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It’s disturbing, to say the least.Perhaps the United States will never be Gilead. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:27 pm by Kevin
Members of the House & Senate of the United States, 2012 WL 5430962 (M.D. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Kevin Johnson
  After decades in the United States, he likely has little familiarity with the Philippines; most friends, family, and community no doubt are in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
With respect to employment in a foreign country, such term includes an individual who is a citizen of the United States. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
The last of these has been a mystery to many scholars and practitioners – indeed, even in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
Mueller, “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (Volume II) (2019)Evidence emerged during the summer and fall of 2016 election that the Russian government was attempting to interfere with the presidential election in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:59 am by SHG
All of which raises the hard question: do foreigners get greater protection under the United States Constitution than United States Citizens on American soil? [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
The statement on behalf of the Plaintiff ’s, argued by Ann Beeson was precise: The court must decide whether the President of the United States is obligated by statutory law to abide by FISA. [read post]