Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 93,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 7:45 am
After the Alaska Supreme Court held that Janus does not require the state to obtain consent, the state came to the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
United States, 13-7120 (ditto); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:50 am
Sleepy’s, LLC, 220 N.J. 289 (2015), a New Jersey appellate panel held, in Garden State Fireworks, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
Debro v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:45 pm
United States v Sandoval Gonzalez, 9th Circuit, April 25, 2011. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) (friend's apartment); United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
But a federal court need not manage all of the delicate foreign relations and regulatory minutiae implicated by climate change to offer real relief, and the mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution.Plaintiffs bring suit to enforce the most basic structural principle embedded in our system of ordered liberty: that the Constitution does not condone the Nation’s willful destruction. [read post]
18 May 2022, 7:18 pm
However, possibly the strongest potential of the Order does not lie in what it enables, but what it disables: it may deter states that are not a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council from employing insincere human rights arguments as a pretext for a military intervention in a neighbouring state. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:52 am
As shown in Niles v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:42 pm
Of course, both parents are expected and legally required to contribute to the cost of raising their children, but the law still does not provide a mechanism to compensate a woman for the earning potential she has lost based on her decisions to marry and have children. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 3:10 pm
In Whitehouse Hotel Limited Partnership v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
" Furthermore, merely because the officer's stop of Petitioner was determined to be invalid does not mean that his conduct was flagrant.Holding:Assuming arguendo that the police encounter constituted an illegal stop, the ultimate question is more appropriate: whether it was proper for the trial court to grant Petitioner's motion to suppress the evidence. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
The case is State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
After the argument involving Second Amendment rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The post Does Fair Use Provide a Celebrity Right to Plagiarize? [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Here's the abstract:In its judgment of 3 February 2012 in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy: Greece intervening), the International Court of Justice has considered the relationship between jus cogens and the rule of State immunity. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
