Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 15,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2021, 11:08 am
That tells us nothing about what happens when the figures for the year are in, and the actual service charge can be calculated and compared to the estimate. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
Butts, the “actual malice” requirement was extended to apply to “public figures” outside government, and then in 1974 case Gertz v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am
Nevertheless, there seems to be a lack of appreciation of problems that may attend the interpretation of emoji, such as we have recently (and commendably) seen in an Australian case, Burrows v Houda, [2020] NSWDC 485. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 2:40 am
That figure will be taken into account by the trial court in determining the reward to be paid to the funder. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
That case, Texas v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
” On the other side of that coin, people feel quite comfortable saying terrible things if they are not worried about being judged harshly.One particularly awful example of this phenomenon is the Supreme Court’s infamous 1986 Bowers v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 10:57 pm
Circuit Tells Lawyers to Stop Using GaramondUnited States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:05 am
From today's Eighth Circuit decision in Nunes v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 7:25 am
Corsi v. [read post]
Labels Matter: How Professor Jack Balkin Snookered Justice Kagan and Others to Fuel Faux Originalism
15 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
By Eric SegallIn 2007, Professor Jack Balkin of Yale Law School shocked the academic world by arguing that Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:52 pm
So relatively slim pickings.Still, I thought that today's (sole) opinion helped prove the point that you can sometimes figure out the way a case will come out merely by seeing the manner in which the opinion frames the facts.For example, here, the first paragraph of the opinion seemed fairly pro-plaintiff, or at least not anti-her. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm
“Luckily I did not have to sit there on my own and try to figure it out. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 6:02 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:10 am
" Schauer points out that the fact that the Constitution is written does not preclude expansive and flexible interpretations--noting that Chief Justice Marshall suggested as much in McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:46 am
Other factors may also be considered, such as the distribution channels of the goods concerned (Caventa v OHIM, T‑224/11).In the present case, the goods were neither of the same nature nor the same purpose, nor were they of the same type nor intended for the same purpose or for the same use. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:22 am
He began, as so many do these days, with the Supreme Court’s shadow docket decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:48 am
This is a follow-up to my previous post on this topic: "No, the Epic v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm
’ [10](iii)(c) ‘Although the Second Claimant is not herself a public figure she is, as the First Claimant’s mother, closely associated with a public figure and her right to privacy is accordingly diminished. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 1:39 pm
The August 18, 2021, Court of Appeals opinion in Weller v. [read post]
