Search for: "Head v. The University"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 9:35 am
Professor Knoop and the University took the view that, in reproducing and distributing its CD-ROM, Directmedia had infringed the copyright of Professor Knoop as compiler of an anthology and the related right of the University as maker of a database. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
In Tuesday’s argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:15 pm
To my mind, for a public service agency to take the tenants' side in this case is wrong-headed. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
From Smiley v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereBowie v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
Harvie Wilkinson, and University of Chicago Law grad (that’s quite a résumé). [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:08 am
"Off with her head! [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
The researchers at Boston University say that C.T.E. is a nascent field of study, but that there is little debate that the disease is caused by repeated blows to the head.[8] Is the NHL Legally Responsible? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:07 am
Circuit’s recent Frederick Douglass Foundation v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
Hansen's tome, Intellectual Property Law and Practice of the United Arab Emirates, published from Oxford University Press's New York desk. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Ivy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
For the rest of the educated universe, most of us are not comfortable with the government killing a citizen based on a proceeding in which a fundamental process was fumbled away in error. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:06 am
For all the power of the American courts in the era of Brown v Board and Roe v Wade, most Americans would be bemused or shocked at the idea of the Justices choosing their own successors, not the President and the Senate. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:50 am
The Strasbourg court has notified Austria that its request for referral of the case of Frodl v Austria to the Grand Chamber has been rejected. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:11 am
Similarly, the New York seminal case is Mauro v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
In an opinion piece for the Washington Post, Roberto Suro suggests that the controversy is headed down a “tortured path to the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 11:43 pm
I must say, for head shot picture books at Universities, yes; for social networking websites, no. [read post]
