Search for: "K. B. R."
Results 2161 - 2180
of 5,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
Both copies were filed with the letter dated 27 November 2008 of the representative of Mr Lee requesting the respective “update” of the EPR. [4.2] Pursuant to Article 39(1)(b) PCT, A 153 EPC, R 159(1) EPC the present international patent application entered the European phase on 10 November 2004, i.e. 31 months from its international filing date of 10 April 2002. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:10 pm
Among the differences between the proposed and final fees, the following are examples for non-small entity applicants:• Correction of inventorship after first Office action (§1.17(d))Proposed: $1,000; Final: $600• Issue fee paid before January 1, 2014 (§1.18(a)(2))Proposed: $960; Final: $1,780 • Ex parte reexamination fee (§1.20(c)(1)):Proposed: $15,000; Final: $12,000 • Ex parte reexamination fee after supplemental examination (§1.20(k)(2))Proposed:… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:04 am
Once identified as having a significant disproportionality, the district must set aside 15 percent of its IDEA, Part B funds to provide comprehensive coordinated early intervening services. [read post]
10 May 2013, 3:16 pm
It's what (a) did (b) did not cause the flash crash of '87. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:30 am
David James Cantor, Fairness, Failure, and Future in the Refugee Regime B S Chimni, Global Compact on Refugees: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back Geoff Gilbert, Indicators for the Global Compact on Refugees Jeff Crisp, A Global Academic Network on Refugees: Some Unanswered Questions Cathryn Costello, Refugees and (Other) Migrants: Will the Global Compacts Ensure Safe Flight and Onward Mobility for Refugees? [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
b. [read post]
13 May 2016, 10:30 am
Calamari, Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, charges Rust and Brenner with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:25 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
School Expulsion/Discipline For Knife Offenses: What IS a Knife Under the California Education Code?
14 Sep 2011, 4:13 pm
Many students are suspended or placed up for expulsion for possession of a "knife," pursuant to California Education Code 48900(b). [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:52 pm
A significant new use is any use involving an application method that generates a vapor, mist, or aerosol; Disposal: Requirements as specified in Section 721.85(a)(1), (a)(2), (b)(1), (b)(2), (c)(1), and (c)(2); and Release to water: Requirements as specified in Section 721.90(b)(1) and (c)(1). [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am
(Jack); Tucker IV, John A.; Vetter, John C.; Kilman, Jonathan P.; Fowler, Kevin; Hyde, Kevin E.; Reck, Kevin A.; Ross, Kevin K.; Wolfson, Mark J.; Traber, Martin A.; Smith, Leslie; Breuer, Matthew G.; Annis, Michael D.; Gay, Michael; Kirwan, Michael B.; Matthews, Michael P.; Okaty, Michael; Strickland, Wes; Shivers, Olin G.; Rosenthal, Paul; Wolfe, Randolph J.; Davis, Richard; Bernstein, Robert S.; Hosay, Robert H.; Meek, E. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:08 am
But in the 21st Century, the bottle numbered 401(k)/403(b) with the message inside of guaranteed lifetime retirement income doesn't have 92 years to wash up on shore with solutions. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:08 am
But in the 21st Century, the bottle numbered 401(k)/403(b) with the message inside of guaranteed lifetime retirement income doesn't have 92 years to wash up on shore with solutions. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:39 pm
§ 204.5(k)(2). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
This approach must fail, because the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) ruled in decision G 11/91 [7] that “[b]efore a correction can be made under R 88, second sentence, it has to be established in point of fact what actually a skilled person would derive, on the date of filing, from the parts of the European patent application relating to the disclosure. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:40 am
R. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
Butler & Kurt R. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:58 am
Posted by Edward B. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
B. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Normally I do not present decisions of the Disciplinary Board, but I found this one quite entertaining.The appeal was filed by a candidate who had failed the EQE 2009 after having been awarded the following marks: A: 49; B: 55; C: 39; D: 57.*** Translation of the German original ***[2.1] The appellant pointed out that the (fictitious) client’s letter on which paper A was based clearly and unambiguously indicated that the client did not desire to obtain patent protection for the… [read post]
