Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 61,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm
Williamson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
Did they mean to give the State a way to introduce potentially dissimilar extraneous offense evidence against a defendant, too? [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:46 am
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
The United States Supreme Court in Godinez v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 8:51 am
It took the Court of Appeals 2.5 years to reach a decision in this case, holding in a 2-1 vote that the State of New York can regulate this speech.The case is Children First Foundation v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:12 am
This combination means that many state regulatory bodies can, accidentally or on purpose, act in ways that infringe on plan sponsors’ express rights under ERISA to be free of state regulation with regard to their employee benefit plans. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am
New Article: Natasha V. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:05 pm
This is a question of the meaning of a California state law, on which the California Supreme Court's decision in Tobacco II is determinative. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am
In this case, that means applying the one-year statute of limitations. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 3:06 pm
-COS.MET Srl v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Further, among the public benefits that government distributes is K-12 education, which means that this rendering of equal protection guarantee throws Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:47 am
Carrier means Over the past two months, nearly every personal injury lawyer, insurance claims adjuster, and trial judge has been scrambling trying to figure out what McCormick v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Groch v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:27 am
The recent case of Carter v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 1:47 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 448 F.3d 1324, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
In Kurns et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
A notice of termination may constitute an adverse employment action within the meaning of Title VII and the Family Medical Leave ActUnited States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, Docket #16-3140 The Second Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled that "a notice of termination itself constitutes an adverse employment action, even when the employer later rescinds the termination. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:44 am
Costco v. [read post]
