Search for: "People v. Herring" Results 2161 - 2180 of 23,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm
 On the downside, lots of people won't let you sit on a jury.Or is that another upside? [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 1:40 pm
"Judge Murguia gets Judge Hurwitz's vote, so her take is now the law of the Ninth Circuit.Some published law. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch J20, the Court restrained publication of private etchings drawn by Queen Victoria and her husband. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Summaries of government, administrative and related law decisions posted by Justia People ex rel. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
  I think most people either know this, or imagine it to be the case, so I won’t waste anymore time on this point. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 11:28 am by Nicole Mazzocco
On April 8, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals published its opinion in People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The test for this Court on an appeal of this nature is whether the decision to which the District Judge has come was open to her or not. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 9:24 am by David Post
She has experience in government, and her service won kudos from her political opponents for the seriousness and care in which she went about her roles as senator and secretary of state. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Shaw's clearly established constitutional rights were violated – constitutional rights that were set forth in the seminal case of Farmer v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Justice Burns found only three people – including Brisciani and another site administrator – were shown to be aware of her identity. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:05 am by INFORRM
Associated claimed that he had been so severely wronged by claims in People magazine attributed to the Duchess’s friends that he had the right to publish the letter in reply. [read post]